<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Smallest Laptop Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/the-smallest-laptop-ever/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/the-smallest-laptop-ever</link>
	<description>Almost two steps ahead of technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap Netbooks</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/the-smallest-laptop-ever/comment-page-1#comment-58166</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Netbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/?p=2242#comment-58166</guid>
		<description>Great article.  If this came out in 1997, why in the world did it take another 10 years for big computer companies to expand on the idea like with the current netbooks.  Sure, $4500 was a crazy price, but I&#039;m sure if they developed the idea further, we would have had netbooks much sooner than just 2 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  If this came out in 1997, why in the world did it take another 10 years for big computer companies to expand on the idea like with the current netbooks.  Sure, $4500 was a crazy price, but I&#8217;m sure if they developed the idea further, we would have had netbooks much sooner than just 2 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/12 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 344/345 objects using memcached

Served from: www.geekwithlaptop.com @ 2012-02-16 18:10:09 -->
