<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Google Buy Yahoo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo</link>
	<description>Almost two steps ahead of technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myra</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/comment-page-1#comment-5424</link>
		<dc:creator>Myra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/#comment-5424</guid>
		<description>I think that Google should put more effort toward making some of its existing products better. Merging with Yahoo just doesn&#039;t sound like a good idea. It would probably be more of a hassle than it&#039;s worth; not to mention Google is having such problems with acquiring DoubleClick.

Does anyone else think that Microsoft might end up with DoubleClick after all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Google should put more effort toward making some of its existing products better. Merging with Yahoo just doesn&#8217;t sound like a good idea. It would probably be more of a hassle than it&#8217;s worth; not to mention Google is having such problems with acquiring DoubleClick.</p>
<p>Does anyone else think that Microsoft might end up with DoubleClick after all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/comment-page-1#comment-5410</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/#comment-5410</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to see Google and Microsoft get into a battle over Yahoo!

Just imagine what that would do to Yahoo&#039;s share price. 

If Google made a bid, you can bet dollars to donuts that Microsoft would jump into the mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see Google and Microsoft get into a battle over Yahoo!</p>
<p>Just imagine what that would do to Yahoo&#8217;s share price. </p>
<p>If Google made a bid, you can bet dollars to donuts that Microsoft would jump into the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellie</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/comment-page-1#comment-5409</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/#comment-5409</guid>
		<description>If memory serves me, some time ago Google would not turn over users private search information to the U.S. Government when Yahoo and others did. 

I believe todays issues with the the spolight on Google trying to buy DoubleClick is all because of this past lack of cooperation (which I applaud Google for doing). 

Unfortunetly, it is pointless for Google to even spend a second on trying to buy Yahoo. The powers that be will make sure it is not going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If memory serves me, some time ago Google would not turn over users private search information to the U.S. Government when Yahoo and others did. </p>
<p>I believe todays issues with the the spolight on Google trying to buy DoubleClick is all because of this past lack of cooperation (which I applaud Google for doing). </p>
<p>Unfortunetly, it is pointless for Google to even spend a second on trying to buy Yahoo. The powers that be will make sure it is not going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/comment-page-1#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/should-google-buy-yahoo/#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>Seems pretty silly to me ... Google&#039;s products are for the most part better and easier to use ... Yahoo&#039;s a dinasaur. Why waste money on merging with all that dead weight when you could spend it on your own technology and better marketing of your existing products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems pretty silly to me &#8230; Google&#8217;s products are for the most part better and easier to use &#8230; Yahoo&#8217;s a dinasaur. Why waste money on merging with all that dead weight when you could spend it on your own technology and better marketing of your existing products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/15 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 395/396 objects using memcached

Served from: www.geekwithlaptop.com @ 2012-02-16 17:40:54 -->
