<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Popular Antivirus Ratings for the Best Software</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/popular-antivirus-ratings-for-the-best-software/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/popular-antivirus-ratings-for-the-best-software</link> <description>Laptops, Netbooks, Gadgets - News and Reviews from the Geek perspective!</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:53:14 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Gary</title><link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/popular-antivirus-ratings-for-the-best-software/comment-page-1#comment-65881</link> <dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:28:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/?p=2521#comment-65881</guid> <description>I agree with Anteaus.  I am highly skeptical of anyone or website that is rating software based in what is installed on computers.  Similarly I never take serious any security software ratings from websites that have security software adverting or links to purchase this software.  The one exception is - http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php.  Once you read the process involved in testing and how hard they are on the software companies the ads have absolutely no relationshp to the labs ratings.  I did some extensive searches looking of anti-virus testing and kept seeing the same thing about ESET NOD32, it ranks consitently near the top.  However, I should point out that their ranking drops when their NOD32 suite is tested.  It drops because of the integrated firewall.  But as a stand alone anti-virus it is near the top.  I&#039;ve never had need to call NOD support, but I have yet to find anyone offering great support.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Anteaus.  I am highly skeptical of anyone or website that is rating software based in what is installed on computers.  Similarly I never take serious any security software ratings from websites that have security software adverting or links to purchase this software.  The one exception is &#8211; <a
href="http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php</a>.  Once you read the process involved in testing and how hard they are on the software companies the ads have absolutely no relationshp to the labs ratings.  I did some extensive searches looking of anti-virus testing and kept seeing the same thing about ESET NOD32, it ranks consitently near the top.  However, I should point out that their ranking drops when their NOD32 suite is tested.  It drops because of the integrated firewall.  But as a stand alone anti-virus it is near the top.  I&#8217;ve never had need to call NOD support, but I have yet to find anyone offering great support.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matay0</title><link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/popular-antivirus-ratings-for-the-best-software/comment-page-1#comment-65414</link> <dc:creator>Matay0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/?p=2521#comment-65414</guid> <description>Amani....ESET NOD32 has the worst support I have ever come across...that being said first it is the best Anti-Virus I have yet worked with.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amani&#8230;.ESET NOD32 has the worst support I have ever come across&#8230;that being said first it is the best Anti-Virus I have yet worked with.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amani</title><link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/popular-antivirus-ratings-for-the-best-software/comment-page-1#comment-65188</link> <dc:creator>Amani</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:38:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/?p=2521#comment-65188</guid> <description>What about ESET NOD 32?  How does it Rank with the rest of the Antivirus?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about ESET NOD 32?  How does it Rank with the rest of the Antivirus?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anteaus</title><link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/popular-antivirus-ratings-for-the-best-software/comment-page-1#comment-64855</link> <dc:creator>Anteaus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:42:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/?p=2521#comment-64855</guid> <description>Saying that an AV product sold by way of enforced preinstall on new computers is popular is a bit like saying HIV is popular because millions of people have it.Truth of the matter is that the &#039;big two&#039; (Norton/McAfee) operate in this way, and it creates a distorted picture of which AV products people actualy choose, rather then have foisted upon them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that an AV product sold by way of enforced preinstall on new computers is popular is a bit like saying HIV is popular because millions of people have it.</p><p>Truth of the matter is that the &#8216;big two&#8217; (Norton/McAfee) operate in this way, and it creates a distorted picture of which AV products people actualy choose, rather then have foisted upon them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/17 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via 

Served from: host2.geekwithlaptop.com @ 2009-11-24 23:53:38 -->