<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Needs Integrated Online Storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/microsoft-needs-integrated-online-storage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/microsoft-needs-integrated-online-storage</link>
	<description>Almost two steps ahead of technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meller</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/microsoft-needs-integrated-online-storage/comment-page-1#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/microsoft-needs-integrated-online-storage/#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>Well that just wouldn&#039;t work at all... See, the whole web-based email storage thing is total crap. No one is going to use 5 GB of storage for their email, particularly with the types of file-size restrictions they put in place. It&#039;s like overselling on hosting: you promise people x, but you know that y% of them aren&#039;t going to use it, so you can fit z% more users on your existing infrastructure.

If they let you use that same 5 GB of storage for other files through SkyDrive, it would totally eat their infrastructure because people *would* use it there.

While they can throw around big numbers that sound impressive for webmail without any fear of having to beef up their infrastructure, the same isn&#039;t true for online file storage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that just wouldn&#8217;t work at all&#8230; See, the whole web-based email storage thing is total crap. No one is going to use 5 GB of storage for their email, particularly with the types of file-size restrictions they put in place. It&#8217;s like overselling on hosting: you promise people x, but you know that y% of them aren&#8217;t going to use it, so you can fit z% more users on your existing infrastructure.</p>
<p>If they let you use that same 5 GB of storage for other files through SkyDrive, it would totally eat their infrastructure because people *would* use it there.</p>
<p>While they can throw around big numbers that sound impressive for webmail without any fear of having to beef up their infrastructure, the same isn&#8217;t true for online file storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/12 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 344/345 objects using memcached

Served from: www.geekwithlaptop.com @ 2012-02-17 15:39:24 -->
