<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: ICANN Again Vetoes ..XXX Domain</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/icann-again-vetoes-xxx-domain/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/icann-again-vetoes-xxx-domain</link> <description>Laptops, Netbooks, Gadgets - News and Reviews from the Geek perspective!</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:34:08 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Luke</title><link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/icann-again-vetoes-xxx-domain/comment-page-1#comment-3583</link> <dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 00:00:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/icann-again-vetoes-xxx-domain/#comment-3583</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think that a .xxx domain would be an endorsement of pornography. Is there anyone out there who doesn&#039;t realize that porn is freely available on the internet to anyone with half a desire to find it? We&#039;re forcibly reminded of that every few days by another &quot;Are your children safe?&quot; kind of story on the news.I&#039;m undecided on the idea of it being a hassle to regulate, though. I mean, wouldn&#039;t they just apply the usual &#039;net laws (i.e., no child porn) to the domain and allow anyone who wanted a .xxx to have one? Who would sign up for a .xxx without being a pornographer, aside from a few random jackasses who would do it for the novelty of the thing.Oh well, they&#039;re ICANN and I&#039;m not, I&#039;m sure they have a better grasp of the relevant points of the debate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that a .xxx domain would be an endorsement of pornography. Is there anyone out there who doesn&#8217;t realize that porn is freely available on the internet to anyone with half a desire to find it? We&#8217;re forcibly reminded of that every few days by another &#8220;Are your children safe?&#8221; kind of story on the news.</p><p>I&#8217;m undecided on the idea of it being a hassle to regulate, though. I mean, wouldn&#8217;t they just apply the usual &#8216;net laws (i.e., no child porn) to the domain and allow anyone who wanted a .xxx to have one? Who would sign up for a .xxx without being a pornographer, aside from a few random jackasses who would do it for the novelty of the thing.</p><p>Oh well, they&#8217;re ICANN and I&#8217;m not, I&#8217;m sure they have a better grasp of the relevant points of the debate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 4/14 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via 

Served from: host2.geekwithlaptop.com @ 2009-11-25 11:19:46 -->