<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Mathematical Limit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit</link>
	<description>Almost two steps ahead of technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s calculator muffs some math problems &#124; money news blog</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-56602</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s calculator muffs some math problems &#124; money news blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-56602</guid>
		<description>[...] Others have found limits with Google&#8217;s calculator. For example, 2.00135558564^1023 is interpreted by Google&#8217;s calculator as 1.79769313 x 10^308. But increase that number by one eensy tiny amount to 2.00135558565^1023, and Google interprets it as a search, not a math problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Others have found limits with Google&#8217;s calculator. For example, 2.00135558564^1023 is interpreted by Google&#8217;s calculator as 1.79769313 x 10^308. But increase that number by one eensy tiny amount to 2.00135558565^1023, and Google interprets it as a search, not a math problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Mathematical Limit &#171; Radar Busters</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-56601</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Mathematical Limit &#171; Radar Busters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-56601</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-38119</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-38119</guid>
		<description>can anyone solve z(z+1) over 10(z-7)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can anyone solve z(z+1) over 10(z-7)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Illnes</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-35977</link>
		<dc:creator>John Illnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-35977</guid>
		<description>I think the interesting part, google makes this job unknown so  we dont know exactly what is happening.. if google is counting or not.. is nofollow links work for someting or not.. so there is always a hope :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the interesting part, google makes this job unknown so  we dont know exactly what is happening.. if google is counting or not.. is nofollow links work for someting or not.. so there is always a hope <img src='http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Patuzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-4649</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Patuzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4649</guid>
		<description>10^308.2547155599167183999 round to 10^308.2547155599167184.

Note it cannot computer the 4, so the value will be 9 recurring, so we can assume it is less than the 4.

Maths:

2^x=10^308.2547155599167184
xlog 2=log (10^308.2547155599167184)
x=log (10^308.2547155599167184)/log 2
x=1024, therefore:

-2^1024</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10^308.2547155599167183999 round to 10^308.2547155599167184.</p>
<p>Note it cannot computer the 4, so the value will be 9 recurring, so we can assume it is less than the 4.</p>
<p>Maths:</p>
<p>2^x=10^308.2547155599167184<br />
xlog 2=log (10^308.2547155599167184)<br />
x=log (10^308.2547155599167184)/log 2<br />
x=1024, therefore:</p>
<p>-2^1024</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haochi</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-4268</link>
		<dc:creator>Haochi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4268</guid>
		<description>You have forgot the lower limit, which is -1.79769313 x 10^308.

Looks like I am &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlified.com/2006know-more-about-google-week-day-1/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not the only one that&#039;s bore&lt;/a&gt;. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have forgot the lower limit, which is -1.79769313 x 10^308.</p>
<p>Looks like I am <a href="http://googlified.com/2006know-more-about-google-week-day-1/" rel="nofollow">not the only one that&#8217;s bore</a>. <img src='http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xenos</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>xenos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>TRY THIS,

1.9^1024 and you will see the response is simply its value, i.e. = 2.77771303 Ã— 10^285.

You wont find any search results !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRY THIS,</p>
<p>1.9^1024 and you will see the response is simply its value, i.e. = 2.77771303 Ã— 10^285.</p>
<p>You wont find any search results !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Holness</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-4231</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Holness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4231</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the best use of the word &#039;figer&#039; I&#039;ve ever seen. Fumbs up from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the best use of the word &#8216;figer&#8217; I&#8217;ve ever seen. Fumbs up from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoons Plugin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; scooby doo pumpkin template Google&#8217;s Mathematical Limit</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-4229</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoons Plugin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; scooby doo pumpkin template Google&#8217;s Mathematical Limit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4229</guid>
		<description>[...] template How high can Google count? Very high it turns out but there is a limit. scooby doo pronread more &#124; digg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] template How high can Google count? Very high it turns out but there is a limit. scooby doo pronread more | digg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-4225</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4225</guid>
		<description>tite you are a nerd if you can figer out this shit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tite you are a nerd if you can figer out this shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poorsod</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-2#comment-4223</link>
		<dc:creator>poorsod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4223</guid>
		<description>(2^k + 1) - 2^k = 1

Surely, mathematically, the brackets in that are redundant since it&#039;s an addition (of a negative number) not a multiplication? And any number k satisfies that, since it cancels algebraically too.

Or do I misunderstand you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(2^k + 1) &#8211; 2^k = 1</p>
<p>Surely, mathematically, the brackets in that are redundant since it&#8217;s an addition (of a negative number) not a multiplication? And any number k satisfies that, since it cancels algebraically too.</p>
<p>Or do I misunderstand you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko Kettunen</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-1#comment-4222</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Kettunen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4222</guid>
		<description>I thought 42 was the ultimate answer to the life, universe and everything. No wonder they are using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought 42 was the ultimate answer to the life, universe and everything. No wonder they are using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-1#comment-4221</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4221</guid>
		<description>Haha! So it&#039;s true, there&#039;s no such thing as infinity. The universe&#039;s largest number is 2.00135558564^1023

Our universe just got smaller....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! So it&#8217;s true, there&#8217;s no such thing as infinity. The universe&#8217;s largest number is 2.00135558564^1023</p>
<p>Our universe just got smaller&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lol</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-1#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4217</guid>
		<description>rofl, ditto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rofl, ditto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/comment-page-1#comment-4214</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/googles-mathematical-limit/#comment-4214</guid>
		<description>OK now that we have discovered the highest possible number that google can count to - 


Has anyone discovered the lowest possible number ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK now that we have discovered the highest possible number that google can count to &#8211; </p>
<p>Has anyone discovered the lowest possible number ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/26 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 590/591 objects using memcached

Served from: www.geekwithlaptop.com @ 2012-02-17 07:57:24 -->
